Scaling laws for optimization and inference
We study the geometry, complexity, and resource tradeoffs that determine when neural optimizers and inference algorithms scale predictably.
We identify the mathematical bottlenecks that prevent added data, model capacity, optimization effort, or inference computation from becoming reliable improvement.
We study the geometry, complexity, and resource tradeoffs that determine when neural optimizers and inference algorithms scale predictably.
Average risk can conceal important failure modes. Our work uses high dimensional statistics and probability to understand generalization, interpolation, and rare severe errors.
We design particle methods, importance sampling schemes, and stochastic control formulations that convert additional computation into measurable accuracy gains.
Reflected diffusions, basic adjoint relationships, large deviations, and rare events provide a mathematical language for understanding stability and tail behavior.
We ask when sketching, preconditioning, and randomized refinement are not only fast but also stable and accurate in finite precision.
Approximation theory, numerical analysis, and stochastic simulation guide algorithms for PDE learning, operator learning, inverse problems, and uncertainty quantification.
Learned models become more trustworthy when physical structure and simulation reveal, quantify, and correct their defects.
We use AI to explore transformations and counterexamples, then isolate precise mathematical mechanisms and produce human verifiable arguments.